• ‘QEB are a class set. Their prosecutorial and regulatory experience means they are able to navigate all cases and related cases where unlawful behaviour is alleged and can anticipate their opponents position. They have strength and expertise in depth and breadth from the junior to senior end.' Legal 500 2023
  • ''The set clearly has strength-in-depth in a number of practice areas and a number of genuinely talented barristers in my practice areas of crime and police misconduct.'  Legal 500 2023

  • ''They always go out of their way to ensure they provide the best service.' Chambers UK 2023

Regulatory Cases

Metropolitan Police v PC J (2019)

Gross misconduct proceedings involving allegations of...

R v PC x (2018-2019)

R v PC X (Newcastle Crown Court and Court of Appeal Criminal Division, 2018 and 2019)...

GDC v AH (2019)

Lydia Barnfather prosecuted an experienced dental practitioner who had been involved in...

In the Inquest touching upon the death of patient X (2019)

Paul Wakerley represented a general practitioner whose practice had prescribed sedative...

GMC v Dr Andelic (2019)

Thomas Coke-Smyth represented the GMC in a complex and lengthy case against an experienced GP...

SRA v Wedge (2019)

Natasha Tahta, instructed by the SRA, presented before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal in the...

GCC v SS (2019)

Rebecca Harris represented the General Chiropractic Council in a case brought against a...

PC BB v Police Medical Appeal Board (2019)

Paul Wakerley successfully represented a police officer who argued that the police force’s...

The Kark Review (2019)

The Kark Review was an Inquiry on behalf of the Minister for Health into the Fit and Proper...

GDC v SS (2019)

Natasha Tahta presented this case on behalf of the GDC against a registrant concerning a...

Tennis Integrity Unit v Cristobal Saavedra-Corvalan (2019)

Nicholas Corsellis QC appeared for the Tennis Integrity Unit at the hearing of the case against...
  • Page 10 of 29