• ‘QEB are a class set. Their prosecutorial and regulatory experience means they are able to navigate all cases and related cases where unlawful behaviour is alleged and can anticipate their opponents position. They have strength and expertise in depth and breadth from the junior to senior end.' Legal 500 2023
  • ''The set clearly has strength-in-depth in a number of practice areas and a number of genuinely talented barristers in my practice areas of crime and police misconduct.'  Legal 500 2023

  • ''They always go out of their way to ensure they provide the best service.' Chambers UK 2023

Regulatory Cases

GDC v WJ (2020)

Rebecca Harris presented a case on behalf of the GDC in which a dental...

GMC v Dr L (2020)

Paul Raudnitz QC prosecuted a doctor who had failed to diagnose a 13-year-old child who passed...

GMC v Dr P (2018-2019)

Acting for a consultant psychiatrist said to have taken “kickbacks” for referring...

Metropolitan Police v PC K (2019)

Defending a Police Officer accused of Gross Misconduct for bullying, racism, and misuse of...

GDC v TP (2019)

Lydia Barnfather prosecuted a dental practitioner who had been charged with providing multiple...

GOC v S (2019)

Lydia Barnfather successfully represented an optometrist who had been accused of sexual...

GMC v Professor X (2019- present)

Selva Ramasamy QC is representing a leading academic in relation to allegations of financial...

Re: J [2019]

Susannah Stevens represented a Police Federation Representative for the Metropolitan Police...

GMC v Dr X (2019)

Selva Ramasamy QC is defending in a substantial inquiry involving a leading practitioner in the...

Solicitors Regulatory Authority v Abeyewardene

Selva Ramasamy QC defended Mrs Abeyewardene, the principal at a firm of solicitors. The SRA...

GDC v FH & DH (2019)

Natasha Tahta presented the case on behalf of the GDC against two registrants for...

Advice re X LLP (2019)

Natasha Tahta advised the Solicitor’s Regulation Authority on a charging decision against a...
  • Page 8 of 29