• ‘QEB are a class set. Their prosecutorial and regulatory experience means they are able to navigate all cases and related cases where unlawful behaviour is alleged and can anticipate their opponents position. They have strength and expertise in depth and breadth from the junior to senior end.' Legal 500 2023
  • ''The set clearly has strength-in-depth in a number of practice areas and a number of genuinely talented barristers in my practice areas of crime and police misconduct.'  Legal 500 2023

  • ''They always go out of their way to ensure they provide the best service.' Chambers UK 2023

Regulatory Cases

GDC v C (2018)

Paul Raudnitz advised the GDC in its case against a dentist who had been charged with a broad...

Advice and representations against PIN

Ruth Broadbent was instructed to advise on the potential for Judicial Review....

SRA v Dowell (2018)

Natasha Tahta, instructed by the SRA, presented before the SDT in the matter of Gavin...

Inquest into the Death of NM (2018)

Selva Ramasamy QC represented a consultant in this inquiry into the death of a mother and baby in...

GDC v Z (2018)

Nadesh Karu successfully applied to the High Court to extend the suspension of a dentist....

GDC -v- Anita Klimecka-Stankiewicz (2018)

Fallon Alexis acted for General Dental Council in an illegal practice prosecution... ...

GMC v Dr XX (2018)

Selva Ramasamy QC defended a long established doctor accused of sexual assault on a fellow doctor....

Inquest into the death of Mr Campbell (2018)

Mark Aldred represents an officer at the inquest into the death of a man who was killed during a...

FCA v A (2017-2018)

Rhys Meggy acts for a managing director of a leading investment bank, suspected of misconduct and...

GDC v HH (2018)

Paul Wakerley prosecuted a dentist with a lack of basic dental skills for undertaking botched...

GDC v McClure (2018)

Natasha Tahta successfully presented the case against a dentist of over 1000 clinical charges, as...
  • Page 12 of 30