• ‘QEB are a class set. Their prosecutorial and regulatory experience means they are able to navigate all cases and related cases where unlawful behaviour is alleged and can anticipate their opponents position. They have strength and expertise in depth and breadth from the junior to senior end.' Legal 500 2023
  • ''The set clearly has strength-in-depth in a number of practice areas and a number of genuinely talented barristers in my practice areas of crime and police misconduct.'  Legal 500 2023

  • ''They always go out of their way to ensure they provide the best service.' Chambers UK 2023

Regulatory Cases

GMC v GS (2021)

Philip was instructed to defend a doctor who faced a warning from the GMC Investigating Committee...

GMC v AA (2021)

Philip was instructed to defend a doctor who was accused of carrying out inappropriate breast...

GMC v JD (2021)

Philip was instructed to defend a doctor who was accused of theft and possession of controlled...

GMC v SS (2021)

Philip was instructed to defend a doctor who faced fitness to practise proceedings after being...

GMC v BA (2021)

Philip was instructed by the MDU to represent a surgeon in fitness to practise proceedings after a...

Allanson v Solicitors Regulation Authority

  Mr Roger Allanson was found to have dishonestly produced marketing material for a...

GMC v Dr Z (2020)

Selva Ramasamy QC succeeds in abuse of process submission at the MPTS, persuading the MPT that to...

GOC v HR (2020)

The disciplinary proceedings against Honey Rose, the optometrist whose criminal conviction for...

GDC v L (2020)

Selva Ramasamy QC has been instructed to represent the General Dental Council (‘GDC’)...

GMC v Dr x (2019-20)

Selva Ramasamy QC succeeds in abuse of process submission at the MPTS, persuading the MPT that the...

HCPC v AP (2020)

Philip was instructed privately to defend a superintendent radiographer who faced criminal...
  • Page 6 of 29