• ‘QEB are a class set. Their prosecutorial and regulatory experience means they are able to navigate all cases and related cases where unlawful behaviour is alleged and can anticipate their opponents position. They have strength and expertise in depth and breadth from the junior to senior end.' Legal 500 2023
  • ''The set clearly has strength-in-depth in a number of practice areas and a number of genuinely talented barristers in my practice areas of crime and police misconduct.'  Legal 500 2023

  • ''They always go out of their way to ensure they provide the best service.' Chambers UK 2023

Regulatory Cases

GCC v R (2017)

Instructed by Capsticks to represent the General Chiropractic Council in a case heard before their...

GDC v O'Brien (2017)

Dentist erased for dishonesty....

GMC v Brito-Babapulle (2017)

Paul Wakerley represented the GMC in the hearing of allegations of misconduct against Dr...

BHA v Adam Carter (2017)

Caoimhe Daly represented the British Horseracing Authority (BHA) before an Inquiry into charges of...

GDC v Gomes (2017)

Misconduct proceedings relating to nine patients....

GDC v Hermann (2017)

Conducted the case for the GDC against a dentist accused of misconduct in relation to root canal...

Former PC J v IPCC (2017)

​Susannah Stevens assisted by Nadesh Karu successfully applied for a judicial review of...

General Dental Council v J (2016-17)

Advising the GDC on a case of alleged impairment of fitness to practise based on adverse health,...

NMC v Doherty in the Court of Appeal (2017)

Tom Kark represented Nurse Doherty in her appeal to the Court of Appeal (Civ) against the decision...

GMC v Dr R (2017)

Presented case on behalf of the GMC against doctor who entered the UK Ebola Screening Centre with...
  • Page 14 of 30