• ‘QEB are a class set. Their prosecutorial and regulatory experience means they are able to navigate all cases and related cases where unlawful behaviour is alleged and can anticipate their opponents position. They have strength and expertise in depth and breadth from the junior to senior end.' Legal 500 2023
  • ''The set clearly has strength-in-depth in a number of practice areas and a number of genuinely talented barristers in my practice areas of crime and police misconduct.'  Legal 500 2023

  • ''They always go out of their way to ensure they provide the best service.' Chambers UK 2023

Regulatory Cases

GDC v Hermann (2017)

Conducted the case for the GDC against a dentist accused of misconduct in relation to root canal...

Former PC J v IPCC (2017)

​Susannah Stevens assisted by Nadesh Karu successfully applied for a judicial review of...

General Dental Council v J (2016-17)

Advising the GDC on a case of alleged impairment of fitness to practise based on adverse health,...

NMC v Doherty in the Court of Appeal (2017)

Tom Kark represented Nurse Doherty in her appeal to the Court of Appeal (Civ) against the decision...

GMC v Dr R (2017)

Presented case on behalf of the GMC against doctor who entered the UK Ebola Screening Centre with...

Re X [An asset manager] (2017)

Advising an asset manager as to the extent of its anti-bribery and corruption systems’ and...

GMC v Dr B (2017)

Lydia Barnfather defends doctor accused of sexualised behaviour to six women including staff....

NMC v L (2017)

Ms L faced numerous allegations of dishonesty and misconduct arising out of clinical failings and...

FCA v J (2017) (Ongoing)

Defending a CEO of a regulated firm before the RDC for alleged oversight failings in relation to...

FCA v Chhabra (2016)

Successful application before the RDC for revocation of a prohibition...
  • Page 14 of 29